News
  UK
    Crime
    Environment
    Health/Medical
    Legal
    Media
    Politics
    This Britain
    Transport
    Ulster
  Europe
  World
    Environment
    Politics
    Sci/Technology
    Africa
    Americas
    Asia
    Australasia
    Middle East
    Robert Fisk
  Business
    News
    Analysis & Features
    Comment
    Citywire
  People
    Obituaries
    Profiles

 

Home  > News > UK > Transport

Across the site

Editor's Choice

John Gray
Iraq isn't another Vietnam - it's much worse

Questions please ...
... for Paul Burrell, formerly Diana's butler

Bathing beauties
Best resorts for hot property beach huts

What now for India?
Sonia Gandhi denies dynasty a new era of leadership

Past, present, future?
Perception that is fundamental to our survival

Interactive
Independent Book Group

Also from this section

Norris pledges to make Tube safe for women

Six killed in pile-up near Brighton

Tube and rail workers to vote on joint strike

Drivers to get flexible speeding penalties

Emergency summit called as petrol hits record price

Minor speeding penalties to be cut

By Colin Brown, Deputy Political Editor

17 May 2004

Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, is preparing to lower the penalties on motorists for minor speeding offences to defuse a growing row over speed cameras.

Downing Street has become alarmed by motorists' hostility towards speed cameras. Speeding offences incur three penalty points and drivers who amass 12 points on their licences face an automatic ban.

Mr Darling will try to calm the public outcry by launching a consultation next month on proposals to reduce the number of points for each offence from three to two, if the driver has been marginally over the speed limit. The penalty for those caught travelling well in excess of the speed limit could be raised to six points.

In 2002, 30,000 drivers lost their licences through the totting up of points. The number of motorists caught speeding on camera in 2002 rose by 40 per cent to 1.5 million, Home Office figures show. That could double to an estimated 3 million this year.

Many drivers have to pay high insurance premiums and some can lose their livelihoods if they cannot drive. Many motorists who live in the countryside, and who need their cars to shop or work, regard the speed cameras as a plague.

Mr Darling said: "We must reduce speeding but the public must have confidence that the punishment fits the crime."

Some police forces have been criticised for using the cameras to raise money through fines. Mr Darling said: "The best camera is one that doesn't issue a single ticket as it means people are driving safely within the speed limit."

Tony Vickers, a spokesman for the Association of British Drivers, said: "It's good news that the Government has recognised that the sledgehammer weapons of mass prosecution by speed cameras is causing a great deal of injustice and resentment."

But, he said, the proposals were "too simplistic". The Government should rely on traffic police patrols, rather than cameras, to determine whether someone was driving dangerously or recklessly, he said.

 

 Search this site:
 
 printable versionPrintable Story



Terms of Use | Privacy Policy, including use of cookies | Sign up for our free daily news update
Freelance contributions | Advertise in print | Other Digital sites | Contact us

© 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd