Paraphrasing that moronically Masonic media mantra “this is what
we do” I’d say “these were (bits of) what was done” by me but mostly by my guys
before the gravy gits garrotted all good games a decade ago, when my campus
career combining cerebral creativity with commercial connectivity ceased
courtesy of crucifixion by correctness clowns and churchy creeps in cahoots
with committee conmen. My modest microcosm of English excellence was merely
one of many spawned from soundly schooled science, all cynically slaughtered
in a countrywide culling conducted by cowboys cavalierly seconded from
self-serving sectors to steal essential enlightenment assets from what little
was left after the plethora of prior political plundering of our country’s
classic core capabilities. An Armageddon that was absurdly asserted to be
regionally regenerated renewal crudely crushed over a million meaningfully
maintained in manufactured making and marketing extenuation of external
economic equilibrium, substituting unsustainably subsidised short-sold
stupidity in such as call centres & fast fodders and deadhead degrees,
with woolly webbing and surfed surveying preposterously proclaimed the
pinnacle of prospectively prosperous profundity! æ
|
Flip-siding these follies, top tripe tricksters taking tawdry
Treasury tickets made mega money, with favoured friends of ministry minders,
council cronies & qnango quislings even metamorphosing
into motley millionaires after a decade of diversionary salvation from
slagheap secondment. Standard spiv skiving in property pillaging, business
buggering, financial falsifying, pension pilfering, farm fudging, environment
excoriating, education emaciating, police politicking & health hijacking
has been supplemented in camera criminalising by conning ex-coppers and
software stuffing by scamming self-servers and charity cruising by corrupt
crusaders, all parasitizing our public purse to tune of GDP %s & all
eclipsed for coercive nonscience by codified
contrivances in climate cartooning. It beggars belief bulldog Brits were
tricked into tamely tolerating a drivelling decade of fascist foreign
futility from parliamentary porridge oafs who pick-pocketed poor old Percy’s
hydrocarbon heritage, squalidly screwing such stupendous sums as to crucify
crucial capabilities in caring citizenry that Anglos always assumed assured.æ
|
All this insanity cremated any chance of me recovering a
reasonable return on or even retrieving my innovation investment of a
half-million or so made from fault fixing and gizmo generating insights and
inspirations during earlier eras of excellence. Indeed, with another
half-million denied due to penalisation by premature pensioning a decade ago,
it has also perished prospects of my marriage mellowing into relaxed
retirement. Instead of the millionaire’s makeover
mansion with which sensible souls would have redeemed their readies, I’m now
burdened with brandishing a begging bowl for recruitment to rescue my rocked
relationship. So skim my stuff to see its amazing adroitness even excellence
evinced in 4+ incisively independent pivotal pointers as tipping tricks, when
nowadays 1- procures professorial persistence and 2- suffices to secure soft
sinecure of emeritus extension! Bureauggery busted
me because my brain was bent on boosted beneficialities
as advancement avenues but not my bum on blustered banalities in kickback cul de sacs! n
|
####
By cretinous criteria of bean-bagged bureaucracy, my
career-consolidated count of peered produce appears pretty paltry against
aggressively ambitious also-rans asserting a century or more, colluding cowboys
even claiming such counts before their forties nowadays. But bloated
book-keeping, more multi-milked than double-entered, is merely a moronic
modern*IT*y embraced by academic apparatchiks despite despise of leading
luminaries who traditionally audited achievement for advancement. So thanks to
guru grandees I did okay consolidating my campus career in teaching and
training twin-tracked throughout with technology and transfer as commercial
context, even in my last residence at a repressively reversionary redbrick
where my survival was sustained solely by a soundly schooled scientific VC who
protected me against pompous petty persecution for campaigning to consolidate
conversion of my campus concepts. How crucial he’d (Sir Michael Thomson;
ex-Harwell AERE physicist , ex-Sussex Uni VC) been only became clear on his retirement when the
spiteful self-servers straightaway went baying for my blood, their absurd
ardour amplified by arrival of affirmative action asphyxiating experienced
excellence and cultural correctness crushing rigorous rightness, both bits of baloney
bollocks embraced by MT’s replacement. Reinforced by
rabidly rampant religiosity of inquisitional intensity they determined to
destroy me disciplinarily via decidedly dubious disrepute for my media
motor-mouthing, always administratively unauthorised but tacitly tolerated in
endless exploitation for PR press promotion featuring favourable fruits of my
fortitude. So I was always confident my crucifixion could be counterclaimed
contractually citing especially persistently prevented promotion even to extent
that could be construed conspiracy for constructed dismissal. That said,
bureaucratic blackballing for now nigh on decade has denied me due deserts to
tune of upwards £K500 all told net of the paltry pension paid as blood bucks
when the craptrappers killed my career. #### My
courage to contest their conspiracy came from a former rugby mate who’d just treetopped as Law Soc Pres, his help conveyed via a former
ACAS head honcho who said that me being unrepentantly Neanglothal
(middleclass-age dozenally bred bulldog whitey
winner), especially a HIFlier (Highly Inspired
Fixer), there was no way he’d carry QC cudgels on a contingency claim that’d be
dead-ducked by Newlaboural tribunal tricky-dicks
forever favouring only LCDodgers (Lowly Correctnessed Dimwit)! But emboldened by his brickbatting of bureauggery I
adaptively alleged a leading lawyer was eager to embark pro bono on battling
for the benefit of promotional publicity, a sweet sting that secured me a
splendid settlement, maybe best ever by way of premature pensions prevailing at
that time. However my pleasure predicated on commercial consolidation was
almost immediately murdered by the mediocrity mafia, their blackmail bitchiness
reinforced by regressive RDAs that decimated over a
million sensibly sustainable situations at behest of gormless government
scandalously scamming public possessions for pathetic pittances, most
notoriously being GB’s defence jewels junked into QinetiQ without any
recognition of original inventive ownership always substantially sourced from
third parties like me! Must mention my battle bravery was boosted by the sadly
now late great founding chairman of IWM, at that time
regionally renowned as an SME sounding skateboard for
intrepid innovators. An old school good guy known nationally not least for
instigating the inaugural GB Inventions Fair well away from Luvvyland,
at WM’s NEC heartland, Malcolm Addy’s
ardour was absurdly asphyxiated when AWM apparatchiks
anonymously arrogated all activities to London’s
quisling quargo. With AWM
now notorious for its failure to furnish regional revival via replacements for
murdered manufacturing, its victims may
well feel it’s been more fraudulent fiasco with upwards £M400pa scandalously
squandered over what will soon be ten years without any sign of significant
succour for self-sustaining social stability! Personally profitable, publicly
pointless properteering and projecturing
prettifications aplenty but no sign of socially significant substance by way of
innovationally inventive initiatives nor intellectually inspired ideas! ####
Okay, then, what about my peered produce? Well, pride of place goes to first
papers published as core condensate from my PhD thesis completed courtesy of a
stalwart supervisor Neil Stevenson (TNS, tenured at
Manchester Uni throughout his career until retirement
some time ago). Chunks of this stuff were also reproduced in a famous
foundation monograph by the late great Sir James Lighthill,
probably publicly unknown even as Hawking’s
predecessor Lucasian incumbent, no doubt denied deserved
recognition due to profundity, secrecy and diversity of his games, as well as
media modesty. I discovered only recently, decades after it was done and all
the more extraordinarily from head honcho at a top Russian RAS institute, that
my elementary mathematical formulation for internal waves had been adopted as
Greens function foundation for scoring success in stratification stealthing of submarines by the USSR as well as the USA,
not to mention good old UK of course! Yuli Chasheshkin even Tom Clancied his
story by saying the development had been deemed dangerously destabilising,
enough to have triggered urgent secret talks between the cold warriors on
revising the ground rules for detection engagement! Surely Serendipity then
that my PhD project was selected for compatibility with pub lunches after footy
& squash whilst awaiting accumulation of data dribbling from the test tank!
Not bad as bonus considering my old grammar school headmaster deemed me
undeserving for Loxbridge and for mathematics as core
course anywhere! #### Also substantial, by all accounts, was a paper reporting
an experiment radically delineating definitive descriptions for boundary
blockage of turbulence, verifying an elementary theory that amazingly escaped
detection during over a century of intensively funded R&D, all the more so
considering not just its simplicity but profound practical implications for
aeroplane/engine efficiency, a major motivation for military megabucks burned
by principal players throughout that period. I suppose it’s a gauge for
gullibility of modelling merchants that approximate amendments cobbled up by
code conveyors were uncritically adopted by supposedly scientific end-users
despite still serious scaling shortfalls. Similar sloppiness, now endemic
across all engineering arenas, is exemplified in evolutionary excesses of
environmental extemporisation most culpably by CO2 climate cowboys! Flight fuel
efficiency neatly nuances contemporary civilian context for criteria from
foundation formulations for boundary blockage! Similarly substantial
significance was also attributed to a foundation formulation for the
mathematics of multiphase dynamics, by way of a force law correcting decades of
manipulatively massaged “models” contrived for computational conjectures mainly
and alarmingly aimed at assessing loss of coolant criticality in nuclear power
plant, mainly as US-NRC and US-DOD megabucks
motivated by meltdown mathsturbation! Amusingly, the
new result reproduced a formulation from 50 years earlier derived to gauge gust
response of airships, asymptotically being entirely equivalent entities
embedded in atmospheric turbulence. This development was done by Sir GI Taylor,
top HMG adviser for over forty years who mentored Lightill
into post as Director of RAE Farnborough. Taylor also seeded early ideas on
boundary blocked turbulence, principal points of which were demonstrated by AA
Townsend in alliance with GK Batchelor, both
antipodeans recruited to Cambridge by Taylor and GKB
later to be long term head of DAMTP including during Lighthill’s Lucasian tenure. At
the time these bits were done I was blissfully unaware how they complemented
Tom Clancy colouring of my PhD, realising only much later how clustering
engagement of bubbles by boundary wave turbulence dictates sea noise and limits
detection of anthropogenic anomalies in underwater acoustics. More on this
later! #### In this plethora of posh naming I must mention Townsend’s protégé
Peter Bradshaw was tenured faculty at Imperial Aero during my spell there
mentored by PW Bearman
(later head and pro-Rector) and I was fortunate to share the wind tunnel study
of boundary blocked turbulence with PB’s then student
Phil Hancock who co-authored our resulting paper and since been long term
tenured at Surrey Uni. Bradshaw long ago relocated to Stanford’s Turbulence
Unit established by Bill Reynolds whose much earlier experiment was done at too
low Reynolds number for retrieval of the essential inviscid
scaling established in our study endorsing the theoretical description
co-published by Julian Hunt (JCRH, then tenured in DAMTP, now Lording it at UCL) and
Mike Graham (JMRG tenured at Imperial Aero, later
Head, now Emeritus).The success of that liaison (JMRG
recently said it triggered ten times the interest of all his other papers) prompted
JCRH to recruit me to DAMTP
where we mentored the multiphase mathematical reformulation mentioned above as
a PhD project by Tim Auton (last to do Maths Tripos Part 3 in three years, recruited to ICI’s then
pharmacological group at Alderley Park). Essential
elements of these studies were quickly conveyed in contemporary conference
papers reporting also experimental verifications in a PhD project by Kevin Sene (recruited to Inst Hydrology Wallingford), all of it
eventually consolidated in journal papers. Last time I saw him years ago PB (long ago Emeritus) was embarking on experimental
excursions of boundary blockage probably for MEMS
devices for turbulence drag reduction, again as always motivated mainly by
military money. "Plus c'est la meme chose, plus ça change"! #### Years later I was on faculty in Brum when a military materials man arrived to see JT Davies
(then Chemeng Head) as renowned expert in surfactant
process chemistry. But JT had died the day before so I was deputised as
dabbling dilettante, not for any established expertise. With Q&C piety paper pledged, practical purpose was
portrayed as prospective suppression by surfactants of sea surface sloshing for
sensitivity of devices deployed from helicopters, such silencing films being
feasible only if remarkably resilient in rotor downwash. This Tom Clancy stuff
was irresistible, more so with my entrance exam prescribed as provision of
compare-contrast report on established mathematical modelling of film-damped
wave dynamics. Well I was lucky enough to do this bit RITE = Right 1st Time
Exactly, moreover managing to report within a week even to extent of
eliminating not just elucidating all various errors and omissions that dogged
all earlier expositions, including in benchmark books by grandees Lamb (Hydrodynamics)
who mentored Taylor and Levich (Physicochemical Hydrodynamics) who mentored Chasheshkin! My
thing wasn’t peer published but essence was highlighted much later in a Nature
article by JC Scott renowned for a lifetime inspired
by Benjamin Franklin’s oiling troubled water, a military sonar scientist who PhDed with T Brooke Benjamin who was also tutored by
Taylor. Unpublished also was my shortcut sum assessing rotor resilience of
filmed damping,, formulated as a viscoelastically
skinned extension of John Mile’s classical work on wind-waves, similar to stuff
that since appeared on ruffling response aka cats’ paws but lacking filmed
surface suppression. Must mention JT dreaded conferencing his stuff in front of
GKB famed for condemning compromised rigour
especially prevalent from chemists with pretensions as physicists. I always
wondered if JT had supported my recruitment with a view to protection in this
respect so was ironic indeed that the mantle he bequeathed to me transpired to
be such a strikingly successful longstanding liaison with Rod Lane, a top class
military materialist at what was then ARE Holton Heath. Extraordinary looking
back that initiation on fundamentals in filming flowology
spawned so much more in what had been to me entirely alien arenas of nonlinear
materials, acoustics and dynamics for submarine stealth and sonar transducers,
all done and dusted over a decade ago yet still hasn’t hardly at all been
duplicated never mind displaced in publicised stuff. More below, also on how
Scott’s stuff looped back yet again to DAMTP-Cambridge
via David Crighton as another Lightill
acolyte and Batchelor’s successor! Extraordinary
adventures! #### Before the Clancy connections for filming factors an
indication of interesting important implications ignored in all climate
cartoons. I’m moved by massive massed mantras of media manipulators on further
feeding frenzies this time triggered by 4TV’s splendid sideswipe 8mar07 at
codswallop crusading contrived to create contemporary fears of fossilised fuel.
I was dogmatic denier a decade before absurd assertions were boosted by Blairian baloney on ‘97 election explosion of his Babe’
bandwagon for focus follies cascaded to a crescendo of millennial madness since
superheated in Stern strictures stupidly spawned from ecological exaggerations
by gumbo gITs & gormless greenies for pecuniary
& political privileges. After rancid rips-off already rendered in billion
bust Dome & Y2K & Casino fraudulent fiascos & many more, it’s
always been clear that collusion cowboys corruptly cocaine on sly spun cynical
scamming but nothing on such awesomely Orwellian scale & spectrum as the
carbon conspiracy that’ll terminate tenable trading across the entire
Euro-economy. Still stumps me that slapstick pseudoscience carried conviction to
create a cataclysmic campaign against carbon although crossed my mind
politically polarised policy was pipelined as long ago as ’01 when JCRH, newly Lorded Luvvie as Met
Office ex-MD, hosted MP Ian Gibson as Blair’s Babe on S&T
committee at a Science Museum showcase soiree. I attended aiming to assert a
floor note on fundamental flaws in fudged fixes for air-sea exchanges, of
similar significance to contribution from clouds also comparably cobbled in
these codified cartoons originally contrived as conversions of US-DOD nuclear winter codes. At the time I still had a legacy
of my role (courtesy of JCRH!) as founding chair of a
European Club on Wind-Over-Waves (WOW!) through whose auspices an IMA Conf co-convened in ’97 with a really good guy Sajjadi, like me a bureauggered
Brit but he slipped his slaving shackles & succeeded Stateside some time
since. By any standards the bash was singularly successful in booking the best
of big boys across the board in that business, a dozen FRS matched by overseas
equivalents, yet for all extraordinary expertise on all aspects of interactions
only one (me & JCS) provided a perspective on how
filming factors compromise convection in air-sea exchanges, heat & gas
transfer as well as waves, both directly dissipative & indirectly
inhibitive reduced rippling. #### My paper with JCS
contributed a condensate of the calculations that had catapulted my Clancy
cavorting nigh on a decade earlier. At the time and during the decade since I
aired it as arguably expert opinion on striking significance of its
implications for apparently perturbed weather patterns since the 70s origin of
that supposed stick signature claimed for carbon catastrophe but more
rationally and ironically for sure coinciding with rigidly regulated regime of
emissions imposing introduction of super surfactants for suppression of smog
from primary particles. Dispersive long range spreading & sedimentation
sheeting of the sea this super stuff suppresses aqueous aspiration by killing
key component capillary clefts akin to emphysemic
inhibition of alveoli and with more than enough to sustain suffocation of
coastal collars to >100km, there has been a powerful prima facie case for
consideration yet I never recovered any expressed interest from anyone in that
arena! Plausibly also a prima facie pointer to political poisoning of
philosophical propriety! Must mention that dogmatic dunce
disciples denied for decades any substantial significance for ionised aerosol
& magnetic polar interactions with solar flux which eventually emerged as
essential in any adequate account of weather dynamics. Indeed even as
recently as that ’01 Science Museum soiree, Piers Corbyn
now well known as an advocate of solar significance was more rejected than
respected by establishment experts eagerly egging their carbon caricature for
every prospective penny of prejudiced policy. So no surprise mantra merchants
like Monbiot and his mates milking percy public purse courtesy of
charity charades like Greedpiece and Erfiends still denigrate him as denier of their nonscience despite carping concession of 30% consistency
contribution by professionals cynically seldom mentioned in media. Climate
cretins are also dogmatically in denial of comparable contribution of water
vapour despite self-evidence even with only rudimentary recognition of forcing
factors. Simply seeing <400ppm of CO2 is <4% of H2O (<1% vapour)
suffices to signpost 50% greenhouse gain from just a 2% rise in vapour against
4% reality conceded even by contriving codifiers. So only stridently specious
selectivity by manipulative media merchants could’ve so cavalierly consolidated
a cowboy case so successfully that no-one knows 4% real increase in 1% vapour
greenhouses as much as all CO2! Even professional protagonists don’t deny at
least 30% should be attributed, about as much as solar stuff campaigned by Corbyn. #### So that leaves <30% as causation candidate
for CO2 up by <30% on pre70s levels. Activists asserted heating was always
caused by CO2 as actuality over aeons but with heat also boosting biological
conversion, anyone with an iota about biota expected CO2 lagged not led
historical heating hikes exactly as records reveal & mostly by margins more
like millennia than decades! Indeed it’s all absolutely aligned with J
Lovelock’s Gaia feedback formulation complementing R Carson’s Silent Spring,
together as twinned testament tracts that catalysed crusading campaign
charities whose founding father disciples were decimated by hooray heretics,
long overdue painful punishment for inciting irrationality! Crusading campaigns
recall have been construed on codes as caricatures that can’t even reproduce
the record rates realised since 70s era of regulatory revisions that radically
reduced soot sizes to suppress smog. With monitoring & modelling
methodologies supplanting the intuitively intensive with expensively extensive,
inevitably insight interpretation & clever conclusion got gazumped by a
garish goulash of McLuhan’s media messaging that spelled senescence for
old-school science, stifling sensibility with superficiality. Climate
codswallop provides a paradigm for popped politicking courtesy of cobbled
codifications for components that can’t be consistently characterised, such as
clouds and contrails but massively more fractionated films naturally nanolayered to >12 decades down on resolvability
restraints for modelling with even most monstrous military machines. Envelope
extemporisation suffices to see few ppm particulates
as few um combusted crud from few kL fuel conveys
coating contamination to few dha, also approximately
allowance per pop of liveable land & shallow sea and consistent with
coverage of all available area during a decade of dumping kLpa
as a patchwork prevailing to the planet’s polarities! Filming favours water
warming by reducing wind waves & evaporative exchanges, raising reserves
for rabid releases in tropical storms as popularly perceived and promoted by
professional pundits milking media mileage. By same token filmed inhibition of
nucleated condensation slows cloud consolidation, delaying but not reducing
rainfall meaning same amount in fewer but bigger batches. Intensified heating
in filmed insolation & immobilisation atop
viscously confined freezing polar water plausibly provides platform principles
for mechanistically modelling melting of glacial ice margins by waterline
undercutting akin to chalk cliff erosion whilst film blocked evaporative
reduction reproduces reality of field data worldwide since the 70s in contrast
to coded contrivances recently rigged to eliminate their evaporative error by
ad hoc artefact of UV attenuation arbitrarily ascribed to amplified altitude
aerosol blithely ignoring the conflict of this contrivance with massively
multiplied melanoma since 70s! #### I’ve been banging away on all aspects for 2
decades since my initiation on film fundamentals and all to no avail apart from
an EC-IST-F5 proposal I contrived for conspired compliance with codswallop
constraints of Brussels burgers, a project in any case hijacked by g*IT*s for
woolly webbageing without a sliver of scientific
sensibility! Ridiculous really seeing as all elementary indicators carried
compelling conviction for comprehensive consideration on Occam’s account alone,
in complete contrast to cobbled correlations codified into climate cartoons. My
clincher was the BBC Horizon howler that haplessly (as ever) deliberated a
dumbest downed debate in advertising absurdities of mindless mantras from
manipulative Met mathsturbaters desperately denying
their formulations followed expectations of enhanced evaporation in a warmer
world, that adding altitude aerosol wasn’t an artefact for compliance of modelling with measurement, rather yet
another artefact added to a myriad more in computational caricatures created as
pseuscience persuaders for politicos in pursuit of
profoundly unprincipled policies. Even some simplest of sums as suggested
suffice to implicate the regulatory revisions imposed since 70s resulting in
particulate sizes squeezed from ~ten to few um, following 50s legislation that
took them from tens. The intended substantial significance for dispersion
distances can be seen via simple sum for settling speed scaled on shear speeds
of eddy excursions, tens cm/s rms for daily breezes
to 10m/s meaning 100um (1m/s) don’t escape entrainment elevations for urban
roughness ranging to tens m whereas 1um (<1mm/s) attain altitude >km,
even effectively filling 10km orso atmospheric
boundary layers in overland fetches & transportable enough to reach
planetary polarities. So additional to filming from sea settling as surveyed
there’s albedo alteration due to depositional
darkening of snowy surfaces, noted indeed in popularly publicised spoilage of
skiing slopes! So simplest of scaling sums sufficed to produce prima facie
predication for properly provisioned project, indeed irresistibly so had
science not be subjugated by socio slapstickers for
eco correctness clowning that’s busted billions in conjectured craptrap, cretinously copied in madness mantras intoned by mouthy
madams, generically gendered if I’m to escape persecution by political police
overpaid & pensioned to peruse all penning for possible prosecution
courtesy of our orwellianly overbearing obermeisters! So sad that despite endless airings with
allegedly expert academics, face-to-face and from the floor at venerable venues,
no-one ever deemed that I deserved to play a part correcting what’s been an
absurd comedy of correctness clowning. But then all our sensibilities societal
as well as scientific ones, have been crushed by
cowboys in killing off pretty much all that once made up GB’s greatness... and
goodness! [TBC....]
EMAIL EXCLUSION AND APPEAL FOR ASSISTANCE
PLEASE PERSEVERE AND COMPLAIN
TO YOUR SYSTEM SUPPORT IF YOUR REPLY IS RETURNED OR REJECTED
Dear Curtailed Correspondent >
Many months of reducing
reliability, recently even excluding
rudimentary "receipts" for bounced or binned mail,
prompted energetic enquiries that exposed an epidemic in
exclusion algorithms activated by flawed filtering in juvenile junkmailers. These autocratic automatons have falsely
flagged my silly syntax as pressed pork in their canned category,
even to 150/50 condensate = summary extinction times three! It really
is extinction because reinstatement may entail individual requests to each and
every rejecting operator ~ all effectively inaccessible of course and none
amenable to anything in the current climate of media manipulated hysteria that
has spawned antispam as foremost amongst
fashionable fads down kickback cul-de-sac.
Absence of assistance from
the regulator regarding redress has meant I must resort to test precursor
indicating intention to mail on receipt of reply as handshake check that I
won't be wasting my time. Insane isn't it, driven back to darkest DOS
days of explicit echo-exchanges but I can't see any other escape from the
evil empire that evolved from elementary emailing. Blair's boloney encouraged
me to be e-verything yet now I can't sustain @nything, not even personal pottering never mind
professional portfolios. I should have anticipated inanimation
would be inevitable, thereby spinning cyberspace into alignment with all
his other e-xciting @dventures.
PS Even more problematic for
me has been identity invasion by a malevolent maniac who has not yet been
excluded by any of the operators or regulators from systematically spawning corrupted
e-mails and attachments purporting to originate from xxx@thomas.net ~ aliasing my own bona fide mailto:thomas.net%25neale@thomas.net address.
Please ensure you reliably report any abuses so as not to encourage your system
support to erroneously encompass my own in their enthusiastic exclusion of
anything that smacks of spam or scam. Neale@Thomas.net
has never been responsible for anything aberrant apart from enthusiastic
eccentricity, a trait once deemed endearing and democratically deserving
to endure despite correctness culture!
23Aug
PS’ Well, well ~ my micro campaign seemingly stimulated quick corrective
concession that embedded addressing (above) indeed allowed identity invasion
that crucified my correspondence. From now on my messages will be individually
authenticated via the routing BIOS of the relay service. Unclear how this
change can reinstate academic
acceptability with campus ostriches obsessed with obstruction but at
least the earlier error has finally been eliminated after nine months of
expanding exclusion. Meanwhile I am now in hot pursuit of exemplorary
extermination of the culprit and remediative
recompense for service slackness from suppliers contractually content to pocket
my prepayments whilst denying due diligence in precautionary prevention. Watch
this space!
3Sep
BTconnect Usersite:Q- How do I set
up message rules to reduce spam? A- The
BT Business spam filter checks incoming emails and 'tags' the subject header of
those which it identifies as spam with *SPAM?*. These emails will still be
delivered to your inbox but are now easily identifiable as spam. Most email
clients such as Outlook allow you to set up message rules to help identify spam
and delete it. Consequently, you can set up a rule so that any incoming mail
that the spam filter has tagged as being *SPAM?* is automatically deleted or
removed and filed away in a personal folder.
My reaction- So this alone accounts for decimation of
mail by their spammer ~ my dyslexic mail is retained by recipient for reference
in his impeccably standard Fowler reply which then gets captioned en route to
me courtesy of my own ISP’s Bayesian Bananas and my reply is then rejected by
his mail server for having been marked up as SPAM. Now that’s surely about as
silly as could be especially with excessive sensitivities of BT’s Bananas ~
contrast Bradford Uni’s X-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.206 (required 8) for
a message mail versus simply signatured blank test
mails encountering BT’s X-Junkmail-Status: 45-65/90
(90 sets SPAM flag). How silly!