configuration |
communication |
consolidation |
Constipation |
Contemplation |
combination |
conceptuation |
Commerciation |
Verifiably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
Paraphrasing that moronically Masonic media mantra “this is what
we do” I’d say “these were (bits of) what was done” by me but mostly by my
guys before the gravy gits garrotted all good games a decade ago, when my
campus career combining cerebral creativity with commercial connectivity
ceased courtesy of crucifixion by correctness clowns and churchy creeps in
cahoots with committee conmen. My modest microcosm of English excellence was
merely one of many spawned from soundly schooled science, all cynically
slaughtered in a countrywide culling conducted by cowboys cavalierly seconded
from self-serving sectors to steal essential enlightenment assets from what
little was left after the plethora of prior political plundering of our
country’s classic core capabilities. An Armageddon that was absurdly asserted
to be regionally regenerated renewal crudely crushed over a million
meaningfully maintained in manufactured making and marketing extenuation of
external economic equilibrium, substituting unsustainably subsidised
short-sold stupidity in such as call centres & fast fodders and deadhead
degrees, with woolly webbing and surfed surveying preposterously proclaimed
the pinnacle of prospectively prosperous profundity! æ |
Flip-siding these follies, top tripe tricksters taking tawdry Treasury
tickets made mega money, with favoured friends of ministry minders, council
cronies & qnango quislings even metamorphosing
into motley millionaires after a decade of diversionary salvation from
slagheap secondment. Standard spiv skiving in property pillaging, business
buggering, financial falsifying, pension pilfering, farm fudging, environment
excoriating, education emaciating, police politicking & health hijacking
has been supplemented in camera criminalising by conning ex-coppers and software
stuffing by scamming self-servers and charity cruising by corrupt crusaders,
all parasitizing our public purse to tune of GDP %s & all eclipsed for
coercive nonscience by codified contrivances in
climate cartooning. It beggars belief bulldog Brits were tricked into tamely
tolerating a drivelling decade of fascist foreign futility from parliamentary
porridge oafs who pick-pocketed poor old Percy’s hydrocarbon heritage,
squalidly screwing such stupendous sums as to crucify crucial capabilities in
caring citizenry that Anglos always assumed assured.æ |
All this insanity cremated any chance of me recovering a
reasonable return on or even retrieving my innovation investment of a
half-million or so made from fault fixing and gizmo generating insights and
inspirations during earlier eras of excellence. Indeed, with another
half-million denied due to penalisation by premature pensioning a decade ago,
it has also perished prospects of my marriage mellowing into relaxed
retirement. Instead of the millionaire’s makeover mansion
with which sensible souls would have redeemed their readies, I’m now burdened
with brandishing a begging bowl for recruitment to rescue my rocked
relationship. So skim my stuff to see its amazing adroitness even excellence
evinced in 4+ incisively independent pivotal pointers as tipping tricks, when
nowadays 1- procures professorial persistence and 2- suffices to secure soft
sinecure of emeritus extension! Bureauggery busted
me because my brain was bent on boosted beneficialities
as advancement avenues but not my bum on blustered banalities in kickback cul de sacs! n |
By cretinous
criteria of bean-bagged bureaucracy, my career-consolidated count of peered produce
appears pretty paltry against aggressively ambitious also-rans asserting a
century or more, colluding cowboys even claiming such counts before their
forties nowadays. But bloated book-keeping, more multi-milked than
double-entered, is merely a moronic modern*IT*y embraced by academic
apparatchiks despite despise of leading luminaries who traditionally audited
achievement for advancement. So thanks to guru grandees I did okay
consolidating my campus career in teaching and training twin-tracked throughout
with technology and transfer as commercial context, even in my last residence
at a repressively reversionary redbrick where my survival was sustained
solely by a soundly schooled scientific VC who protected me against pompous
petty persecution for campaigning to consolidate conversion of my campus
concepts. How crucial he’d (Sir Michael
Thomson; ex-Harwell AERE physicist , ex-Sussex Uni
VC) been only became clear on his retirement when the spiteful self-servers
straightaway went baying for my blood, their absurd ardour amplified by
arrival of affirmative action asphyxiating experienced excellence and
cultural correctness crushing rigorous rightness, both bits of baloney
bollocks embraced by MT’s replacement. Reinforced
by rabidly rampant religiosity of inquisitional intensity they determined to
destroy me disciplinarily via decidedly dubious disrepute for my media
motor-mouthing, always administratively unauthorised but tacitly tolerated in
endless exploitation for PR press promotion featuring favourable fruits of my
fortitude. So I was always confident my crucifixion could be counterclaimed
contractually citing especially persistently prevented promotion even to
extent that could be construed conspiracy for constructed dismissal. That
said, bureaucratic blackballing for now nigh on decade has denied me due
deserts to tune of upwards £K500 all told net of the paltry pension paid as
blood bucks when the craptrappers killed my career.
È |
Æ My courage to contest
their conspiracy came from a former rugby mate who’d just treetopped
as Law Soc Pres, his help conveyed via a former ACAS head honcho who said
that me being unrepentantly Neanglothal
(middleclass-age dozenally bred bulldog whitey
winner), especially a HIFlier (Highly Inspired
Fixer), there was no way he’d carry QC cudgels on a contingency claim that’d
be dead-ducked by Newlaboural tribunal tricky-dicks
forever favouring only LCDodgers (Lowly Correctnessed Dimwit)! But emboldened by his brickbatting of bureauggery I
adaptively alleged a leading lawyer was eager to embark pro bono on battling
for the benefit of promotional publicity, a sweet sting that secured me a
splendid settlement, maybe best ever by way of premature pensions prevailing
at that time. However my pleasure predicated on commercial consolidation was
almost immediately murdered by the mediocrity mafia, their blackmail
bitchiness reinforced by regressive RDAs that
decimated over a million sensibly sustainable situations at behest of
gormless government scandalously scamming public possessions for pathetic
pittances, most notoriously being GB’s defence jewels junked into QinetiQ
without any recognition of original inventive ownership always substantially
sourced from third parties like me! Must mention my battle bravery was boosted by the
sadly now late great founding chairman of IWM, at that time regionally
renowned as an SME sounding skateboard for intrepid innovators. An old school
good guy known nationally not least for instigating the inaugural GB
Inventions Fair well away from Luvvyland, at WM’s NEC heartland, Malcolm Addy’s
ardour was absurdly asphyxiated when AWM apparatchiks anonymously arrogated
all activities to |
Æ Okay, then, what about my
peered produce? Well, pride of place goes to first papers published as core
condensate from my PhD thesis completed courtesy of a stalwart supervisor
Neil Stevenson (TNS, tenured at Manchester Uni
throughout his career until retirement some time ago). Chunks of this stuff
were also reproduced in a famous foundation monograph by the late great Sir
James Lighthill, probably publicly unknown even as Hawking’s predecessor Lucasian
incumbent, no doubt denied deserved recognition due to profundity, secrecy
and diversity of his games, as well as media modesty. I discovered only recently, decades
after it was done and all the more extraordinarily from head honcho at a top
Russian RAS institute, that my elementary mathematical formulation for
internal waves had been adopted as Greens function foundation for scoring
success in stratification stealthing of submarines
by the USSR as well as the USA, not to mention good old UK of course! Yuli Chasheshkin even Tom Clancied his story by saying the development had been
deemed dangerously destabilising, enough to have triggered urgent secret
talks between the cold warriors on revising the ground rules for detection
engagement! Surely Serendipity then that my PhD
project was selected for compatibility with pub lunches after footy &
squash whilst awaiting accumulation of data dribbling from the test tank! Not
bad as bonus considering my old grammar school headmaster deemed me
undeserving for Loxbridge and for mathematics as
core course anywhere! È |
Æ Also substantial, by all
accounts, was a paper reporting an experiment radically delineating
definitive descriptions for boundary blockage of turbulence, verifying an
elementary theory that amazingly escaped detection during over a century of
intensively funded R&D, all the more so considering not just its
simplicity but profound practical implications for aeroplane/engine
efficiency, a major motivation for military megabucks burned by principal
players throughout that period. I suppose it’s a gauge for gullibility of
modelling merchants that approximate amendments cobbled up by code conveyors
were uncritically adopted by supposedly scientific end-users despite still
serious scaling shortfalls. Similar sloppiness, now endemic across all
engineering arenas, is exemplified in evolutionary excesses of environmental
extemporisation most culpably by CO2 climate cowboys! Flight fuel efficiency
neatly nuances contemporary civilian context for criteria from foundation
formulations for boundary blockage! Similarly substantial significance was also
attributed to a foundation formulation for the mathematics of multiphase
dynamics, by way of a force law correcting decades of manipulatively massaged
“models” contrived for computational conjectures mainly and alarmingly aimed
at assessing loss of coolant criticality in nuclear power plant, mainly as
US-NRC and US-DOD megabucks motivated by meltdown mathsturbation!
Amusingly, the new result reproduced a formulation from 50 years earlier
derived to gauge gust response of airships, asymptotically being entirely
equivalent entities embedded in atmospheric turbulence. This development was
done by Sir GI Taylor, top HMG adviser for over forty years who mentored Lightill into post as Director of RAE Farnborough. Taylor
also seeded early ideas on boundary blocked turbulence, principal points of
which were demonstrated by AA Townsend in alliance with GK Batchelor, both
antipodeans recruited to Cambridge by Taylor and GKB later to be long term
head of DAMTP including during Lighthill’s Lucasian tenure. At the time these bits were done I was blissfully
unaware how they complemented Tom Clancy colouring of my PhD, realising only
much later how clustering engagement of bubbles by boundary wave turbulence
dictates sea noise and limits detection of anthropogenic anomalies in
underwater acoustics. More on this later! È |
Æ In this plethora of posh
naming I must mention Townsend’s protégé Peter Bradshaw was tenured faculty
at Imperial Aero during my spell there mentored by PW Bearman
(later head and pro-Rector) and I was fortunate to share the wind tunnel
study of boundary blocked turbulence with PB’s then
student Phil Hancock who co-authored our resulting paper and since been long
term tenured at Surrey Uni. Bradshaw long ago relocated to Stanford’s
Turbulence Unit established by Bill Reynolds whose much earlier experiment
was done at too low Reynolds number for retrieval of the essential inviscid scaling established in our study endorsing the
theoretical description co-published by Julian Hunt (JCRH, then tenured in
DAMTP, now Lording it at UCL) and Mike Graham (JMRG tenured at Imperial Aero,
later Head, now Emeritus). The success of that liaison (JMRG recently said
it triggered ten times the interest of all his other papers) prompted JCRH to
recruit me to DAMTP where we mentored the multiphase mathematical
reformulation mentioned above as a PhD project by Tim Auton
(last to do Maths Tripos Part 3 in three years,
recruited to ICI’s then pharmacological group at Alderley
Park). Essential elements of these studies were quickly conveyed in
contemporary conference papers reporting also experimental verifications in a
PhD project by Kevin Sene (recruited to Inst
Hydrology Wallingford), all of it eventually consolidated in journal papers. Last time I saw him years ago PB (long ago
Emeritus) was embarking on experimental excursions of boundary blockage
probably for MEMS devices for turbulence drag reduction, again as always
motivated mainly by military money. "Plus c'est
la meme chose, plus ça change"! È |
Æ Years later I was on
faculty in Brum when a military materials man
arrived to see JT Davies (then Chemeng Head) as
renowned expert in surfactant process chemistry. But JT had died the day
before so I was deputised as dabbling dilettante, not for any established
expertise. With Q&C piety paper pledged, practical purpose was portrayed
as prospective suppression by surfactants of sea surface sloshing for
sensitivity of devices deployed from helicopters, such silencing films being
feasible only if remarkably resilient in rotor downwash. This Tom Clancy stuff was
irresistible, more so with my entrance exam prescribed as provision of
compare-contrast report on established mathematical modelling of film-damped
wave dynamics. Well I was lucky enough to do this bit RITE = Right 1st Time
Exactly, moreover managing to report within a week even to extent of
eliminating not just elucidating all various errors and omissions that dogged
all earlier expositions, including in benchmark books by grandees Lamb (Hydrodynamics)
who mentored Taylor and Levich (Physicochemical Hydrodynamics) who mentored Chasheshkin! My thing wasn’t peer published but
essence was highlighted much later in a Nature article by JC Scott renowned
for a lifetime inspired by Benjamin Franklin’s oiling troubled water, a
military sonar scientist who PhDed with T Brooke
Benjamin who was also tutored by Taylor. Unpublished also was my shortcut sum
assessing rotor resilience of filmed damping,, formulated as a viscoelastically skinned extension of John Mile’s
classical work on wind-waves, similar to stuff that since appeared on
ruffling response aka cats’ paws but lacking filmed surface suppression. Must mention JT dreaded conferencing
his stuff in front of GKB famed for condemning compromised rigour especially
prevalent from chemists with pretensions as physicists. I always wondered if
JT had supported my recruitment with a view to protection in this respect so
was ironic indeed that the mantle he bequeathed to me transpired to be such a
strikingly successful longstanding liaison with Rod Lane, a top class
military materialist at what was then ARE Holton Heath. Extraordinary looking
back that initiation on fundamentals in filming flowology
spawned so much more in what had been to me entirely alien arenas of
nonlinear materials, acoustics and dynamics for submarine stealth and sonar
transducers, all done and dusted over a decade ago yet still hasn’t hardly at
all been duplicated never mind displaced in publicised stuff. More below,
also on how Scott’s stuff looped back yet again to DAMTP-Cambridge via David Crighton as another Lightill
acolyte and Batchelor’s successor! Extraordinary adventures! É |
Æ I’ve
been banging away on all aspects for 2 decades since my initiation on film fundamentals
and all to no avail apart from an EC-IST-F5 proposal I contrived for
conspired compliance with codswallop constraints of Brussels burgers, a
project in any case hijacked by g*IT*s for woolly webbageing
without a sliver of scientific sensibility! Ridiculous really seeing as all
elementary indicators carried compelling conviction for comprehensive
consideration on Occam’s account alone, in complete contrast to cobbled
correlations codified into climate cartoons. My clincher was the BBC Horizon howler
that haplessly (as ever) deliberated a dumbest downed debate in advertising
absurdities of mindless mantras from manipulative Met mathsturbaters
desperately denying their formulations followed expectations of enhanced
evaporation in a warmer world, that adding altitude aerosol wasn’t an
artefact for compliance of modelling
with measurement, rather yet another artefact added to a myriad more in
computational caricatures created as pseuscience
persuaders for politicos in pursuit of profoundly unprincipled policies. Even
some simplest of sums as suggested suffice to implicate the regulatory
revisions imposed since 70s resulting in particulate sizes squeezed from ~ten
to few um, following 50s legislation that took them from tens. The intended
substantial significance for dispersion distances can be seen via simple sum
for settling speed scaled on shear speeds of eddy excursions, tens cm/s rms for daily breezes to 10m/s meaning 100um (1m/s) don’t
escape entrainment elevations for urban roughness ranging to tens m whereas
1um (<1mm/s) attain altitude >km, even effectively filling 10km orso atmospheric boundary layers in overland fetches
& transportable enough to reach planetary polarities. So additional to
filming from sea settling as surveyed there’s albedo alteration due to
depositional darkening of snowy surfaces, noted indeed in popularly
publicised spoilage of skiing slopes! So simplest of scaling sums sufficed to
produce prima facie predication for properly provisioned project, indeed
irresistibly so had science not be subjugated by socio slapstickers
for eco correctness clowning that’s busted billions in conjectured craptrap, cretinously copied in madness mantras intoned by mouthy
madams, generically gendered if I’m to escape persecution by political police
overpaid & pensioned to peruse all penning for possible prosecution
courtesy of our orwellianly overbearing obermeisters! So sad that despite endless airings with
allegedly expert academics, face-to-face and from the floor at venerable
venues, no-one ever deemed that I deserved to play a part correcting what’s
been an absurd comedy of correctness clowning. But then all our sensibilities
societal as well as scientific ones, have been
crushed by cowboys in killing off pretty much all that once made up GB’s
greatness... and goodness! É TBC.... |
|
Æ So
that leaves <30% as causation candidate for CO2 up by <30% on pre70s
levels. Activists asserted heating was always caused by CO2 as actuality over
aeons but with heat also boosting biological conversion, anyone with an iota
about biota expected CO2 lagged not led historical heating hikes exactly as
records reveal & mostly by margins more like millennia than decades!
Indeed it’s all absolutely aligned with J Lovelock’s Gaia feedback
formulation complementing R Carson’s Silent Spring, together as twinned
testament tracts that catalysed crusading campaign charities whose founding
father disciples were decimated by hooray heretics, long overdue painful punishment
for inciting irrationality! Crusading campaigns recall have been construed on
codes as caricatures that can’t even reproduce the record rates realised
since 70s era of regulatory revisions that radically reduced soot sizes to
suppress smog. With monitoring & modelling methodologies supplanting the
intuitively intensive with expensively extensive, inevitably insight
interpretation & clever conclusion got gazumped by a garish goulash of
McLuhan’s media messaging that spelled senescence for old-school science,
stifling sensibility with superficiality. Climate
codswallop provides a paradigm for popped politicking courtesy of cobbled
codifications for components that can’t be consistently characterised, such
as clouds and contrails but massively more fractionated films naturally nanolayered to >12 decades down on resolvability
restraints for modelling with even most monstrous military machines. Envelope
extemporisation suffices to see few ppm
particulates as few um combusted crud from few kL
fuel conveys coating contamination to few dha, also
approximately allowance per pop of liveable land & shallow sea and
consistent with coverage of all available area during a decade of dumping kLpa as a patchwork prevailing to the planet’s
polarities! Filming favours water warming by reducing wind waves &
evaporative exchanges, raising reserves for rabid releases in tropical storms
as popularly perceived and promoted by |
Æ My
paper with JCS contributed a condensate of the calculations that had
catapulted my Clancy cavorting nigh on a decade earlier. At the time and
during the decade since I aired it as arguably expert opinion on striking
significance of its implications for apparently perturbed weather patterns
since the 70s origin of that supposed stick signature claimed for carbon
catastrophe but more rationally and ironically for sure coinciding with
rigidly regulated regime of emissions imposing introduction of super
surfactants for suppression of smog from primary particles. Dispersive long
range spreading & sedimentation sheeting of the sea this super stuff
suppresses aqueous aspiration by killing key component capillary clefts akin
to emphysemic inhibition of alveoli and with more
than enough to sustain suffocation of coastal collars to >100km, there has
been a powerful prima facie case for consideration yet I never recovered any
expressed interest from anyone in that arena! Plausibly also a prima facie
pointer to political poisoning of philosophical propriety! Must
mention that dogmatic dunce disciples denied for decades any substantial
significance for ionised aerosol & magnetic polar interactions with solar
flux which eventually emerged as essential in any adequate account of weather
dynamics. Indeed even as recently as that ’01 Science Museum soiree, Piers Corbyn now well known as an advocate of solar
significance was more rejected than respected by establishment experts
eagerly egging their carbon caricature for every prospective penny of
prejudiced policy. So no surprise mantra merchants like Monbiot
and his mates milking percy public purse courtesy
of charity charades like Greedpiece and Erfiends still denigrate him as denier of their nonscience despite carping concession of 30% consistency
contribution by professionals cynically seldom mentioned in media. Climate
cretins are also dogmatically in denial of comparable contribution of water
vapour despite self-evidence even with only rudimentary recognition of
forcing factors. Simply seeing <400ppm of CO2 is <4% of H2O (<1%
vapour) suffices to signpost 50% greenhouse gain from just a 2% rise in
vapour against 4% reality conceded even by contriving codifiers. So only
stridently specious selectivity by manipulative media merchants could’ve so
cavalierly consolidated a cowboy case so successfully that no-one knows 4%
real increase in 1% vapour greenhouses as much as all CO2! Even professional
protagonists don’t deny at least 30% should be attributed, about as much as
solar stuff campaigned by Corbyn. Ç |
Ä Before
the Clancy connections for filming factors an indication of interesting
important implications ignored in all climate cartoons. I’m moved by massive
massed mantras of media manipulators on further feeding frenzies this time triggered
by 4TV’s splendid sideswipe 8mar07 at codswallop crusading contrived to
create contemporary fears of fossilised fuel. I was dogmatic denier a decade
before absurd assertions were boosted by Blairian
baloney on ‘97 election explosion of his Babe’ bandwagon for focus follies
cascaded to a crescendo of millennial madness since superheated in Stern
strictures stupidly spawned from ecological exaggerations by gumbo gITs & gormless greenies for pecuniary &
political privileges. After rancid rips-off already rendered in billion bust
Dome & Y2K & Casino fraudulent fiascos & many more, it’s always
been clear that collusion cowboys corruptly cocaine on sly spun cynical
scamming but nothing on such awesomely Orwellian scale & spectrum as the
carbon conspiracy that’ll terminate tenable trading across the entire
Euro-economy. Still
stumps me that slapstick pseudoscience carried conviction to create a
cataclysmic campaign against carbon although crossed my mind politically
polarised policy was pipelined as long ago as ’01 when JCRH, newly Lorded Luvvie as Met Office ex-MD, hosted MP Ian Gibson as
Blair’s Babe on S&T committee at a Science Museum showcase soiree. I
attended aiming to assert a floor note on fundamental flaws in fudged fixes
for air-sea exchanges, of similar significance to contribution from clouds
also comparably cobbled in these codified cartoons originally contrived as
conversions of US-DOD nuclear winter codes. At the time I still had a legacy
of my role (courtesy of JCRH!) as founding chair of a European Club on
Wind-Over-Waves (WOW!) through whose auspices an IMA Conf co-convened in ’97
with a really good guy Sajjadi, like me a bureauggered Brit but he slipped his slaving shackles
& succeeded Stateside some time since. By any standards the bash was
singularly successful in booking the best of big boys across the board in
that business, a dozen FRS matched by overseas equivalents, yet for all
extraordinary expertise on all aspects of interactions only one (me &
JCS) provided a perspective on how filming factors compromise convection in
air-sea exchanges, heat & gas transfer as well as waves, both directly
dissipative & indirectly inhibitive reduced rippling. Ç |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Curtailed Correspondent >
Many months of reducing
reliability, recently even excluding
rudimentary "receipts" for bounced or binned mail,
prompted energetic enquiries that exposed an epidemic in
exclusion algorithms activated by flawed filtering in juvenile junkmailers. These autocratic automatons have falsely
flagged my silly syntax as pressed pork in their canned category,
even to 150/50 condensate = summary extinction times three! It really
is extinction because reinstatement may entail individual requests to each and
every rejecting operator ~ all effectively inaccessible of course and none
amenable to anything in the current climate of media manipulated hysteria that
has spawned antispam as foremost amongst
fashionable fads down kickback cul-de-sac.
Absence of assistance from
the regulator regarding redress has meant I must resort to test precursor
indicating intention to mail on receipt of reply as handshake check that I
won't be wasting my time. Insane isn't it, driven back to darkest DOS
days of explicit echo-exchanges but I can't see any other escape from the
evil empire that evolved from elementary emailing. Blair's boloney encouraged
me to be e-verything yet now I can't sustain @nything, not even personal pottering never mind
professional portfolios. I should have anticipated inanimation
would be inevitable, thereby spinning cyberspace into alignment with all
his other e-xciting @dventures.
PS Even more problematic for me
has been identity invasion by a malevolent maniac who has not yet been excluded
by any of the operators or regulators from systematically spawning corrupted
e-mails and attachments purporting to originate from xxx@thomas.net ~ aliasing my own bona fide mailto:thomas.net%25neale@thomas.net address.
Please ensure you reliably report any abuses so as not to encourage your system
support to erroneously encompass my own in their enthusiastic exclusion of
anything that smacks of spam or scam. Neale@Thomas.net
has never been responsible for anything aberrant apart from enthusiastic
eccentricity, a trait once deemed endearing and democratically deserving
to endure despite correctness culture!
PS’ Well, well ~ my micro campaign seemingly stimulated quick
corrective concession that embedded addressing (above) indeed allowed identity
invasion that crucified my correspondence. From now on my messages will be
individually authenticated via the routing BIOS of the relay service. Unclear
how this change can reinstate academic
acceptability with campus ostriches obsessed with obstruction but at least
the earlier error has finally been eliminated after nine months of expanding
exclusion. Meanwhile I am now in hot pursuit of exemplorary
extermination of the culprit and remediative
recompense for service slackness from suppliers contractually content to pocket
my prepayments whilst denying due diligence in precautionary prevention. Watch
this space!
BTconnect Usersite:Q- How do I set
up message rules to reduce spam? A- The
BT Business spam filter checks incoming emails and 'tags' the subject header of
those which it identifies as spam with *SPAM?*. These emails will still be
delivered to your inbox but are now easily identifiable as spam. Most email
clients such as Outlook allow you to set up message rules to help identify spam
and delete it. Consequently, you can set up a rule so that any incoming mail
that the spam filter has tagged as being *SPAM?* is automatically deleted or
removed and filed away in a personal folder.
My reaction- So this alone accounts for decimation of
mail by their spammer ~ my dyslexic mail is retained by recipient for reference
in his impeccably standard Fowler reply which then gets captioned en route to
me courtesy of my own ISP’s Bayesian Bananas and my reply is then rejected by
his mail server for having been marked up as SPAM. Now that’s surely about as
silly as could be especially with excessive sensitivities of BT’s Bananas ~
contrast Bradford Uni’s X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not
spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.206 (required 8) for a
message mail versus simply signatured blank test
mails encountering BT’s X-Junkmail-Status: 45-65/90
(90 sets SPAM flag). How silly!